Good translation begins before the first sentence is translated. This resource center is for people who need to prepare a document, brief an interpreter, compare suppliers, localize a product, or decide how much review a project really requires. The guidance is written around decisions that affect accuracy, cost, turnaround and acceptance—not around marketing terminology.
Short resources built around real project decisions rather than another layer of service marketing.
A translator can only make sound decisions when the purpose of the text is clear. A court filing, an internal memo, a product interface and a public campaign may contain similar words, but they do not carry the same risk or require the same review process.
Send the editable source whenever possible. Scans, photographs and locked PDFs can be handled, but poor legibility, missing pages and flattened layouts add uncertainty and production time. If formatting must be reproduced, say so before work begins.
File preparation and formatsTell us who will read the translation and what they will do with it. Official submission, publication, litigation, training, software release and internal reference each call for different choices in terminology, formatting and approval.
Certified and official documentsExisting translations, approved glossaries, product names, previous contracts and preferred spellings are valuable. Supplying them early avoids preventable inconsistency and gives reviewers a clear basis for decisions.
Terminology managementA realistic deadline allows the work to be assigned to the right linguist and gives review enough time to catch issues that fluent drafting alone will not reveal. For urgent work, identify what is genuinely time-critical and what can follow later.
Planning urgent translationNot every text needs the same process. A low-risk recurring update may be suitable for controlled reuse and streamlined review. A contract, medical document or public-facing launch usually justifies stronger specialist checking and formal approval.
How review and QA workFlag sensitive material at intake. Access, retention, AI use, subcontracting restrictions and delivery channels should be agreed before files enter production, particularly for legal, government, medical and commercially sensitive content.
Security and file handlingPrice and turnaround matter, but they do not tell you whether the supplier is suitable for the work. For a serious project, ask who will translate it, what subject experience they have, how terminology is controlled, what happens when the source is ambiguous, who performs final review, and how corrections are recorded. For recurring programs, also ask how previous translations are reused and who owns the language assets.
For certified or official documents, confirm the exact intended authority before ordering. Acceptance rules can depend on the country, institution and document type. A responsible provider should distinguish between what it can certify, what requires legalization or an apostille, and what must be completed by another authority.
Procurement guidance · RFQ preparation · Credentials and references
In Morocco and across the wider region, documents often move between Arabic, French and English while keeping the conventions of an administration, court, bank, company or technical discipline. Names may have established Latin spellings; dates and numbers may need to retain the source format; seals, marginal notes and handwritten additions may carry legal significance. Arabic also introduces right-to-left layout decisions that affect tables, forms, pagination and mixed-script content.
Saudi-facing work raises different practical questions: local terminology, procurement conventions, government platforms, formal Arabic register and market-specific commercial language. We therefore treat Morocco and Saudi Arabia as distinct operating contexts rather than applying one generic Arabic template to both.
Arabic · French · English · All languages
Translation memory can recover previously approved wording. Terminology tools can flag preferred and prohibited terms. Automated QA can catch missing numbers, inconsistent punctuation, broken tags and some formatting problems. Machine translation and large language models can accelerate suitable content. None of those tools can decide by themselves whether a legal phrase is acceptable in context, whether a medical abbreviation is safe to expand, or whether an official name should be translated at all.
The useful question is therefore not “human or AI?” but “what level of automation is appropriate for this content, and who is accountable for the final result?” Sensitive and high-impact material should have a review path proportionate to its consequences.
You do not need to diagnose the project before contacting us. Send the document or describe the requirement. We can identify the language pair, file issues, likely review level, formatting work, certification questions and information still needed for a reliable quote.
